Saturday, September 30, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Oaxaca -- Naval helicopters signal end to protests?

(UPDATE: Sunday --The Secretaria de Gobernacion announced that the military will dislodge the protesters Wednesday, if talks are unsuccessful. They're playing hardball, and -- like I said -- I expect the Governor will be forced to resign). Sara from Oaxaca has the "woman in the street" (or, rather, woman staying at home) report in the "Comments" section. Helicopters Flying Over Oaxacan Encampments Navy flyovers of teachers union and APPO lead to "maximum alert". Warings that protesters may be forcibly dislodged tonight. Jorge Octavio Ochoa (translation by "St. Jacques" and myself) Oaxaca City, Oaxaca (Saturday 30 September 2006)
At 4:30, 4:50 and 5:00 p.m., two Navy helicopters flew through the airspace over the center of Oaxaca City, apparently doing reconnaisance. [Sunday's Jornada confirms that the navy is transporting PFP -- national police paramilitary units -- with flights from Salias Cruz and Baja de Hualtalco] From La Ley radio, the Popular Assembly of the People of Oaxaca (APPO) called for a total alert. At the same time they asked their members to show prudence and calm. "It is not the deciding moment for us. What the PFP [Federal Preventive Police] and Ulises [Oaxacan Governor Ulises Ruiz] want is to provoke a stampede." With this in mind, the APPO called for strengthened vigilence, reiterating that the operation is designed to spread panic. Furthermore, the station claimed Federal forces would seek to dislodge protesters, beginning at 8:00 p.m., and that the attacks would come from two flanks: one on the highway that goes in the direction of Mexico City and another on the encampments erected in the center of the Oaxacan city. Flavio Sosa, one of the directors of APPO, called on all the group's members to mobilize and carry out a march around the Zocalo capital plaza [in the center of Oaxaca City]. In a telephone conversation, Omar Flavio Sosa, asked the governmental representative, Francisco Yañez Centeno: Is this the governmental response?" The government functionary responded that the flights are only for reconnaisance or vigilance. Even so, Flavio Sosa expressed his doubts: "I don't believe it. Fox will have blood on his hands if they undertake these these operations." The Navy helicopters, one of them with the call letters AMMLT-200, also crossed the airspace where the broadcast antennas of La Ley radio are found, which is the only one which continues transmitting APPO's statements, after Radio Oro went off the air yesterday due to supposed technical difficulties. From the kiosk of this city, the directorate of APPO began lighting bonfires to signal the maximum alert.
Something is going on... Jornada reports that APPO claimed shots were fired at their encampments last night. But, as far as anyone knows, the Feds and APPO will be negotiating a settlement this week. Given Ulises' actions last week -- where it looks as if his guards fired on the protesters (and may have been the people behind the attacks on Ricardo Rocha) -- the flyovers and the shots may not be connected. Ulises MAY be trying to provoke an excuse for a crackdown before the Feds -- who are fed up, basically -- remove him from office and put in ... who knows, stay tuned. I'm betting, as an outside chance, Demetrio Soldi, the PRD ex-senator who ran for Mexico City Jefe de Gobernacion as a PANista. will be the interim governor. It makes sense: the opposition to Ulises is from all non-PRI parties (and even from some within the larger "PRI family", like Elba Esther)
All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

No, they aren't headed for the border...

Oaxaca schoolteachers march on Mexico City. Photo taken near the Mixteca community of Petlacingo Oaxaca by AP photographer Joel Merino. While the PRI is still making some claims that Federal troops are needed (to fire on more civilians?), the Federal Government seems to have finally stepped in, announcing they will hold talks with the APPO and the Teachers on October 4.
All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Unconfirmed report on Minutemen helocoper crash...

I picked this up on "freerepublic.com":
Texas Minutemen / Minuteman Project Operation Sovereignty border watch helicopter crashed in the early evening of the 29th while patrolling north of Laredo - south of Eagle Pass - west of Carrizo Springs. Reason for crash unknown, condition of the pilot believed to be ok... no further info available.
There's nothing on any of the wire services yet, nor on the Texas Minuteman site. If true, and nobody was seriously injured... thaen all well and good. Helocopters ain't cheap. Hopefully, they crashed on somebody's land, who isn't going to be real pleased, and will be contacting a lawyer about the nuisance. If anybody -- even if just the minutemen folks -- were injured or killed, it's going to create a real stink. Did this divert the National Guard, or the Border Patrol, or the Local Sheriff's deputies being payed under "Operation Linebacker" (the $10 million the State threw this way to pay deputy sheriffs to work overtime backing up the backups to the Border Patrol... I know a lot of Deputies. They're tired of 80 hour weeks!) from whatever it is they normally do? Are we taxpayers supposed to pay for the damages the Minutemen caused? Wanna bet we're gonna hear some nonsense about the Zetas shooting them down? Oh the humanity!!!!

Friday, September 29, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

OK, maybe a terrorist did cross the border...

Why did I have to find out about this from a CANADIAN source?
The Bush Administration prefers to paint the War on Terror in stark terms of good and evil, but the reality is not all terror suspects are considered equal. That much was clear on the same day that the nation solemnly recalled the fifth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, when a federal magistrate recommended freeing a man being held on immigration charges who is also awaiting retrial in Venezuela for the bombing of a Cuban airliner 30 years ago that resulted in the death of all aboard, including the Cuban national fencing team.

Cuban militant Luis Posada Carriles has been fighting for his release since May 17, 2005, when Department of Homeland Security officials arrested him in Miami for entering the country without having a visa or passing through passport control at the border. But in a move that may come back to haunt the U.S. government Posada, despite his suspected terrorist past, was held on immigration violations, not terror-related charges...

He claims he came in through Mexico by car and then took a bus to Miami. But it is widely believed that a friend may have smuggled him into Miami by boat.

The only other terrorist incident at the Mexican border, BTW, was a stupid gringo from Minnesota trying to enter Mexico with some vague idea of joining a Somali jihad.

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Not good... Oaxaca update...Reporter beaten, one shot... and desperate housewives take control

Dane Schiller, of the San-Antonio Express-News reports from Mexico City:

MEXICO CITY — Tension spiked in the state capital of Oaxaca after masked men armed with clubs searched a luxury hotel room by room, looking for the governor, who was rumored to be there but wasn't.

The state government insisted those who carried out the attack were members of a group of striking teachers and their supporters who have controlled the city's center for months.

...

Activists and police had their biggest clash in months Sunday when hundreds of people marched on the Camino Real hotel, a stone compound built as a convent in 1576.

They surrounded the hotel, and about 40 people entered and searched restaurants, guest rooms and other areas.

The Popular Assembly of the People of Oaxaca, known as APPO, said on its Web site that one member was shot outside the hotel by police or security agents who fired more than 60 rounds.

...

The group searching for Ruiz on Sunday instead found a nationally prominent radio and TV personality, Ricardo Rocha, who had interviewed two congressmen in his room.

While the intruders, who identified themselves as APPO members, threatened to break down the door, the congressmen hid in the bathroom and used their cellular phones to call for help, said Daniel Robles, a producer who works with Rocha.

The congressmen later escaped out a side door, but Rocha was clubbed, temporarily detained and had some of his equipment and video recordings confiscated.

Daniel Dehesa Mora, a Oaxacan and federal congressman with the leftist Democratic Revolution Party, said the men who entered the Camino Real were disguised state police officers trying to make activists look dangerous.

"You could tell from their military-style haircuts and the tone of their voices," he said. "Also, everyone there knows who is who."

APPO has a "mobile brigade" that patrols the city to ensure government officials can't conduct official business. Members have entered offices and detained people.

The organization operates its own security force and has erected more than 100 barricades throughout the city to control who comes and goes after dark.

NO, it is not ok to beat up reporters, even if they are in the same hotel as shitheads like Ulises Ruiz! I'm appalled that the usual left-wing English-language sources (like Narco News) have yet to comment on this. Even (as U.S. newspapers always call him) "ex-communist Mexico City Mayor" Alejandro Encinas was quick to defend Rocha and was appalled by what happened. Encinas, ironically, was attending a luncheon to honor "Freedom of the Press" when he was informed of the doings in Oaxaca. Ciro Gomez Leveya interviewed Rocha yesterday for Radio Foruma (Real Player video here). And... I am more than a little suspicious that Congressman Dehensa Mora is right. This sounds like Oaxaca... where the previous governor tried to pass off a faked assasination attempt (and got himself actually shot in the process -- the dolt!) as a "extremist plot" to overthrow the state government. The "extremists" tend to be more like these desperate housewives turned TV news anchors and media moguls... Soldatas de la revolucion mediatico? Moms? (Google Videos don't always work, for some reason: if not, here's the link.

Monday, September 25, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

The Dog begs...

I'd never heard of "Celebrity Stink", or Scott Gwin, but couldn't help but pass on this update on a barking good tale of gringos gone bad.

"Dog The Bounty Hunter" is frantic to avoid becoming the kind of person he's known for catching. Usually he's the one dragging people to justice but now the Mexican government wants him, his son Leland and another of their associates extradited on charges of illegal activity. The big Dog is prepared to do whatever he has to do to keep it from happening, even apologizing... According to a report from the AP, Dog is willing to forfeit the bail paid in Mexico, apologize for everything except capturing Luster (which ironically is why he's in trouble in the first place), and even make a generous charitable contribution . What's he trying to do, give them grounds for a bribery charge too? ... If there were ever a time for someone in Mexico to want to make a name for themselves as a bounty hunter, this could be their chance. I hear Univision is looking to expand into reality TV. I imagine the guy who brings Dog to justice in Mexico might land a TV show of his own.

That'd be ruuufffff!

I'm coming for YOU... pinche gringo!

Sunday, September 24, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

¡Por la libertad!

By Richard Gonzales Fort Worth Star-Telegram Carmen Puertos drank, smoked and laughed for most of her 92 years. When she chuckled, her open mouth revealed few remaining teeth; she never bothered with dentures. Her earlier photos show a pretty woman with thick brown hair. Time turned it gray and caused her legs to hurt when she walked. But it never took her pride, spunk or freedom. She cared for her grandchildren -- including me -- while her children worked in Chicago factories. She taught her family, in Spanish, not to be cowed by the big, blustering American city. After all, she was a chilanga -- a native of Mexico City who had lived in the capital during the days of dictator Porfirio Diaz and revolutionaries Emiliano Zapata and Pancho Villa. Perhaps the rebellious airs in the days of the Adelitas and soldaderas, or female warriors of the revolution, filled her with an independent spirit. One night when she was 14, she stayed out late to attend a neighborhood fiesta. Fearing the wrath of her father, she ran away to a convent where her older sister was studying to become a nun. Her father forced her to return to his comfortable, maid-tended house, where she could have lived out her years. But Mexico was a macho country with macho men. (Her father was 30 when he married his 14-year-old wife, with whom he would have 14 children.) She wanted to live in the world beyond Don Puertos's reach. So she ran away again at 19 with the help of an older brother. This time she fled to Nuevo Laredo with a female friend to care for her aunt. She worked as a laundress at the Hamilton Hotel in Laredo. When she heard that a family was going to Waukegan, Ill., to open a restaurant, she went along. She proudly told her children that she was never undocumented -- "No era mojada." She walked across the bridge spanning the Rio Grande with papers for which she paid $8. It would be nice to say that life in the United States was pleasant and bountiful for her. In truth, life in the Depression was hard for her and millions of others scrambling for food and work. She married another Mexican immigrant, Juan Reyes, bore him four children and followed the jobs to Chicago, Lyons, Kan., and back to Chicago. In Kansas, she joined other Mexican women to form a mutual aid society that raised money through jamaicas, or fairs, for the election of Mexican President Lazaro Cardenas. During Mexican Independence Day celebrations, she sewed Mexican dresses for her daughters and herself, splashing red, white and green in their skirts, blouses and hair. She played old Mexican songs and taught them to dance traditional steps that she recalled from fiestas. When Kansas commemorated the 400th anniversary of Francisco Vasquez de Coronado's exploration for gold, Carmen Reyes and other Mexican women pooled their money to bring Mexican matadors and bulls to demonstrate the corrida (although the bullfighters would go through the sweeps and turns in their suit of light and crimson capes without the fatal sword plunge). The Kansas townfolk easily accepted the Mexican garb, dances, customs and Spanish. Perhaps the small number of Mexican immigrants, their hard work and neighborliness calmed any fears that they might have harbored of the children of Coronado. There was no bitter history of the Alamo and the Mexican War; instead, they shared a memory of a conquistador traveling with his soldiers and priests in search of wealth. In Chicago, there would be more disappointment and heartache for Carmen as a daughter followed in her footsteps and ran away. Despite their advanced age, Carmen and Juan Reyes adopted the runaway daughter's five children. In later years, Carmen and Juan wanted to live closer to family. And so when she died Aug. 6, 1996, it was in Garland. When I asked my grandmother why she had come to the United States, she answered: Por la libertad -- for the liberty. She wanted the liberties to smoke, drink, marry the man she loved and live in a country where a runaway girl could find a home. Carmen Puertos de Reyes taught her children to cherish their golden freedom.
All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

¡PENDEJO!

I know this really has nothing to do with Mexico, but it's outrageous... No dogs, bottles or Spanish-speakers allowed! I don't know how much good it does to talk to pendejos like Dr. Ken Cherry, but you can always call or write him at: 2105 Park Plaza Dr Springfield TN 37172-3937 Phone: 615-384-2558 The City of Springfield's email address is here. Somehow, if that isn't sufficient, print off the photo below, paste it on a BLUE candle (why blue, I don't know, but that's what my local cuaradaro recommends) and light it at sunset every day for nine days, earnestly reading the attached prayer. Who knows... stranger things have worked.

Friday, September 22, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

WITCH WAY DID THEY GO -- a real MeX-FILE

Monterrey, Mexico (18 Sept 06) - A policeman from Santa Catarina claimed having seen two witches while on a routine patrol near a graveyard several months ago. He only made this information known today. Gerardo Garza Carbajal explained his experience with the supernatural very near the Panteon Municipal, a few meters from the road to Villa Garcia. "It was nighttime, I stayed behind to stand guard on my own and suddenly someone started pelting me with stones. Then I saw two people with wings and wrinked faces." "I was so scared that I got into my squad car. I could hear them laughing in an ugly way, flying a short distance. I thought they were witches--I saw them very close," said the officer, who has a long service record with the local police. Garza Carbajal said that he immediately requested backup, and in a matter of minutes was surrounded by several municipal police cars even some from the Ministerial Police. "The witches flew off, but the police officers who came to my aid saw what I saw. They can attest to the fact that I didn't imagine anything. What I saw was real. I'd never been so scared before," said the officer. He added that he was subsequently taken to a medical center, since his blood pressure dropped excessively. He soon recovered from the powerful shock. Witnesses to this event stated that they do not know for sure if two witches were involved, but are indeed certain that they have no explanation for this phenomenon. (translation © 2006, S. Corrales, IHU. Special thanks to Marco Reynoso, Fundacion Cosmos) I found this on one of the weirder... and more interesting websites around, Inexplicata-The Journal of Hispanic Ufology
All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Viernes: blogiando de Los Gatos...

Everyone from Woody Guthrie (whose wrote it, along with California high school teacher Martin Hoffman), to Joan Baez to Bruce Springsteen to the Byrds to Dolly Parton has sung this... but for some odd reason, there isn't a free internet copy available. Can't figure that one out. Woody's attitude towards copyrights was: "This song is Copyrighted in U.S... for a period of 28 years, and anybody caught singin it without our permission, will be mighty good friends of ourn, cause we don't give a dern. Publish it. Write it. Sing it. Swing to it. Yodel it. We wrote it, that's all we wanted to do." Plane Wreck At Los Gatos (Deportee)
The crops are all in and the peaches are rott'ning, The oranges piled in their creosote dumps; They're flying 'em back to the Mexican border To pay all their money to wade back again Goodbye to my Juan, goodbye, Rosalita, Adios mis amigos, Jesus y Maria; You won't have your names when you ride the big airplane, All they will call you will be "deportees" My father's own father, he waded that river, They took all the money he made in his life; My brothers and sisters come working the fruit trees, And they rode the truck till they took down and died. Some of us are illegal, and some are not wanted, Our work contract's out and we have to move on; Six hundred miles to that Mexican border, They chase us like outlaws, like rustlers, like thieves. We died in your hills, we died in your deserts, We died in your valleys and died on your plains. We died 'neath your trees and we died in your bushes, Both sides of the river, we died just the same. The sky plane caught fire over Los Gatos Canyon, A fireball of lightning, and shook all our hills, Who are all these friends, all scattered like dry leaves? The radio says, "They are just deportees" Is this the best way we can grow our big orchards? Is this the best way we can grow our good fruit? To fall like dry leaves to rot on my topsoil And be called by no name except "deportees"? Words by Woody Guthrie and Music by Martin Hoffman © 1961 (renewed) by TRO-Ludlow Music, Inc.
The agreement of 1947 (between Mexico and the U.S)... contained a novel provision which established amnesty through deportation, agreeing to limit deportations to one per year per farm worker. Under its terms, undocumented Mexicans who were sent back across the border could return to the U.S. as temporary contract labourers; during the life of their contracts, they could not be again deported. In practice, employers often called Border Patrol stations ( la migra) to report their own undocumented employees, who were returned, momentarily, to border cities in Mexico, where they signed labour contracts with the same employers who had denounced them. This process became known as "drying out wetbacks" or "storm and drag immigration." "Drying out" provided a deportation-proof source of cheap seasonal labour... The 28 men who died in Los Gatos were victims of this bizarre system.
All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

What's Mexico Hiding?

By Irma Sandoval and John M. Ackerman September 22, 2006 (Los Angeles Times ©2006) MEXICO now has two presidents-elect. One officially recognized by the electoral authorities — Felipe Calderon — and the other proclaimed the "legitimate president" by millions of followers — Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. There is one way to settle this crisis. As in the aftermath of Bush vs. Gore in the 2000 U.S. presidential election, a group of Mexico's newspapers should be allowed to conduct their own canvass of the ballots. Unfortunately, the Federal Electoral Institute, which organizes the presidential elections, has announced that it will not open up the ballots to public scrutiny. The institute appears bent on repeating the government's performance after the 1988 presidential election, in which the computers "malfunctioned." It is widely believed that massive fraud allowed Carlos Salinas de Gortari, the candidate of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI, to mysteriously overcome the early lead of the leftist candidate, Cuauhtemoc Cardenas. To cover its tracks, the government then quickly burned the evidence. Mexico's freedom of information act, enacted in 2002, is one of the best in the world. It gives full priority to transparency, stating that everything should be made public except when disclosure might harm economic stability or national security. But even this "reserved" information must be made available after 12 years have passed. Mexican law does keep confidential personal information, including names, photographs and sexual orientations of particular individuals. But, of course, secret ballots don't contain any of this material. Although the institute is required by law to destroy the ballots eventually, there is no need to do so immediately. And it would be illegal to carry it out prematurely for the purpose of avoiding the freedom-of-information requests. To his credit, Calderon has asked the institute to "preserve the ballots for as long as possible" in the interest of ensuring the "certainty" of the electoral results. This is a positive step, but it does not get to the heart of the issue. Preserving the ballots will do no good if no one is allowed to examine them. Even worse, Calderon's National Action Party voted Tuesday against forming a special congressional commission to keep watch over the ballots, placing doubt on PAN's commitment to transparency. Calderon and his party should explicitly state that the ballots should be opened to public scrutiny and take measures to ensure this takes place. There is a larger issue. If the Federal Electoral Institute is permitted to hide and prematurely destroy the ballots, this would open the door to widespread flouting of the access-to-information law by other government agencies. The institute has argued that the ballots are not "documents" but only the "material expression of electoral preferences" and therefore not subject to the information law. Such ad hoc re-categorizations for the purpose of avoiding disclosure are punishable by law, and allowing it here would set a dangerous precedent in this fledgling democracy. Mexico's Federal Institute of Access to Public Information, which has the mandate to promote compliance by all government agencies to the access-to-information law, also has maintained a worrisome silence on this crucial issue. It is high time for a public pronouncement by its commissioners backing up the information law. Such a statement also would help dispel concerns about the personal ties and any conflict of interest between the chief commissioner and Calderon IN GENERAL, the electoral authorities have needlessly encouraged suspicions about Calderon's victory. The Federal Electoral Tribunal, which certifies the election results, announced that Calderon won. But it failed to disclose details of its partial recount, which showed widespread irregularities in the computation of the votes. And even though it condemned illegal campaign advertisements and the intervention of President Vicente Fox, it failed to assess their overall impact. In an election decided by only 230,000 votes out of 41 million cast, even small discrepancies could have made a big difference. The Florida ballots from the 2000 U.S. presidential elections were not destroyed. They are available for public viewing and research for generations to come. Recently, Ohio delayed the destruction of its presidential ballots from 2004 to allow further study of irregularities. Mexicans deserve no less. They have a right to know what actually happened on election day. We are at a crucial moment in Mexico's transition to democracy. After 70 years of electoral fraud under the PRI, Fox's PAN government must ensure absolute integrity in the process through which he passes power to Calderon, his PAN successor. Burning the ballots would set back Mexican democracy 20 years. Full access to the ballots — and then a full recount, if it's deemed warranted — by reputable civil society organizations in the manner of Bush vs. Gore would restore credibility to Mexico's damaged electoral institutions. IRMA SANDOVAL and JOHN M. ACKERMAN are professors at the Institute for Social Research and the Institute for Legal Research, respectively, at the National Autonomous University of Mexico. They advised Proceso magazine, whose request for access to the ballots was rejected this month.

Thursday, September 21, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

MAR-EEEE-AAAAAA-CHE!!!!!! (in the concert hall)

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

ALIEN INVASION, remittances to Mexico, etc. Oh my!

The Perfect Swarm...
Yes, in former California Governor Pete Wilson's immortal words, "They just keep coming." Over the last decade, the U.S. State Department estimates that the number of Americans living in Mexico has soared from 200,000 to 1 million (or one-quarter of all U.S. expatriates). Remittances from the United States to Mexico have risen dramatically from $9 billion to $14.5 billion in just two years. Though initially interpreted as representing a huge spike in illegal workers (who send parts of their salaries across the border to family), it turns out to be mainly money sent by Americans to themselves in order to finance Mexican homes and retirements.

Although some of them are certainly naturalized U.S. citizens returning to towns and villages of their birth after lifetimes of toil al otro lado, the director-general of FONATUR, the official agency for tourism development in Mexico, recently characterized the typical investors in that country's real estate as American "baby boomers who have paid off in good part their initial mortgage and are coming into inheritance money."

Indeed, according to the Wall Street Journal, "The land rush is occurring at the beginning of a demographic tidal wave. With more than 70 million American baby boomers expected to retire in the next two decades… some experts predict a vast migration to warmer -- and cheaper -- climates. Often such buyers purchase a property 10 to 15 years before retirement, use it as a vacation home, and then eventually move there for most of the year. Developers increasingly are taking advantage of the trend, building gated communities, condominiums, and golf courses"

Monday, September 18, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Self-appointed bouncers

"The Circus is Back in Town," Victor Landa, San Antonio Express-News Sept. 18, 2006
The Minutemen are back at the border. This time, they picked Laredo, and reports indicate that most Laredo residents would rather they go home. ... ...why are the Minutemen — who, by the way, have proven they need more than a one-minute warning to defend our border because it takes time to pack an SUV and organize a press conference — wasting their time in Laredo? I'm convinced the answer is Hispanic Heritage Month. For four weeks, we'll be celebrating Latinos from the Carolinas to California; the noise will be deafening, the news coverage will be intense, the attention will be hard to ignore. The last thing they want is for foreign Latinos to get the wrong idea. So the Minutemen have gone again to the southern border, along with the Guard and the threat of a two-layered fence. We're having a party, and they are our self-appointed bouncers. Maybe what these people should do is use their enthusiasm in a truly creative way. Maybe they should line their lawn chairs along all the exits of airports that handle international flights. Imagine if this citizen patrol were to stop and question anyone they felt might be a threat to our country. After all, isn't that how the terrorists got in?

Sunday, September 17, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Rain on the parade...

Photos José Antonio López (Top) and Francisco Olvera (Bottom) Jornada
It looks as if Tlaloc, the rain god, is an AMLO supporter:
The Mexico City Herald's coverage was pathetic, missing what was a good story.

There was concern that there might be a confrontation if the two gritos ended up in the same Zocalo.

In Doloros Hidalgo, the 8000 or so spectators included 3500 were police and security personnel. The town was clamped down, and even residents had to show IDs to enter the area. Fox came and went by heliocopter. AND IT RAINED gatos y perros.

In DF, where Alejandro Encinas did the bell-ringing (from City Hall, not the National Palace), assisted by old lefty, human rights fighter and all round rabble rouser (and, now Senadora) Rosario Ibarra de Piedra, all-round intellectual Carlos Monsiváis and... as a sop to the Administration, Secretary of Gobernacion, Carlos Abascal Carranza.

In Doloros Hidalgo, the grito was "¡Viva nuestra Independencia! ¡Vivan los héroes que nos dieron patria y libertad! ¡Viva Hidalgo! ¡Viva Morelos! ¡Viva Allende! ¡Viva Josefa Ortiz de Domínguez! ¡Viva Leona Vicario! ¡Viva nuestra democracia! ¡Vivan nuestras instituciones! ¡Viva la unidad de las y los mexicanos! ¡Viva México!''

In Mexico City, the people gave ¡Vivas! for Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla, José María Morelos y Pavón, Ignacio Allende, Josefa Ortiz de Domínguez, Vicente Guerrero, an extra loud, enthuastic viva for Benito Juárez (the tea-leaf readers are figuring that one out -- BJ managed to maintain the Presidency, while a fraudulently elected foreign-dominated adminstration tried running the country for a while) and popular sovereignty.

As an extra bonus, the people razzed Abascal, joining in the new cheer, "Get lost, asshole!" (¡FUERA! ¡CULITO!). It didn't rain on that party.

Jornada has a good "compare/contrast" on the two gritos.

Seems Mexico City aint't big enough for two gritos... or presidents?

From ¡Para justicia y libertad!

Delegates at the National Democratic Convention (CND) have formally declared Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) as Mexico's "legitimate president" which he is formally set to take office on November 20 at 3 p.m. at Constitution Square in Mexico City.

The delegates at CND also authorize López Obrador to appoint members to his cabinet, he is also authorized to select where the new capital in will be set up in Mexico and right to act as Mexico's official and legitimate president. The new government will observe the framework of a democratic republic, whereby the President of Mexico is both head of state and head of government. As President of the new government, he has the right to collect taxes.

Aerial view of the National Democratic Convention. Photoby Alfredo Dominguez, Jornada

Meanwhile, in Oaxaca...

There was, for the first time, no OFFICAL celebration. The governor doesn't dare show his face... instead, José Cruz Luna, presidente municipal of Zaachila, gave a grito on behalf of the APPO from their headquarters. There were the traditional celebratory dance music and pyrotechnics afterwords, but -- for some reason -- people in Oaxaca tend to leave when there are explosives in the neighborhood these days.

The People celebrating Independence Day by declaring Independence?

HOLY SHIT!!!!

Friday, September 15, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Cats and Dog (Friday Night blogging)

IN what passes for tradition in the Blogosphero, you're supposed to put up a cat picture on Friday nights. So... being Friday, here's "Illegal Alien Mexican Cats" Now, going to the Dog. Duane Lee Chapman (the kind of name that if it's not on a country music singer, is on either a serial killer or the guy whose family is covered in your local paper's county police report). Dog the Bounty Hunter. Duane Lee is in a heap o' trouble. He's a bailbondsman, and famous for bringing bail jumpers to justice. In a "man bites dog" story, the Dog was arrested in Hawaii by U.S. Marshalls on Thursday morning ... on a Mexican warrent charging him with very, very serious crimes. Seems our boy... the famous bail jumper stopper ... jumped bail. Although something of a pariah among "respectable" bailbondsmen "Dog" has his admirers. They seem to overlook the obvious, things you can find, say, in Wikipedia:
Chapman ... joined a motorcycle gang, the Devil's Disciples, that reportedly had a distaste for blacks... According to Chapman, another gang member, Donny Kirkandall, murdered pimp and drug dealer named Jerry Lee Oliver a crime for which Chapman was found in complicity by a Texas judge. Chapman has reportedly been arrested at least 32 times In 1977, Chapman was sentenced to five years of hard labor on murder charges, he served just 18 months before being paroled in 1979. Before his sentencing, Chapman had married, and fathered at least one child. His wife Lafonda filed for divorce while he was in prison on the murder charges. Because Chapman owed money for child support, the judge in charge of handling the child support case asked Chapman to catch a fugitive for $200. This is considered the beginning of his bounty-huting career.
That last sentence doesn't sound like anything that would stand up even under the laxest possible intrepretation of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct. "Dog", out of prison, moved to Hawaii and set up shop as a bailbondsman... how, with his prison record, is never quite clear. Somehow. He's a master showman. When Andrew Luster, heir to the Max Factor cosmetics fortune and serial rapist, ended up in Puerto Vallerta, the Mexican police knew he was there. PV has its share of shady gringos. Intespersed amongst the retirees, the old queens, tthe eurotrash and the gay vacationers are the retired marijuana dealers, ponzi schemers keeping a low profile, the occasional mobster on the wrong side of a family disagreement. Not nice people, but not any particular concern to the Mexicans. Andrew Luster though. A serial rapist, already convicted in California, and facing a 124 year prison term? Mexican prosecutors had already prepared extradition papers and were waiting for the FBI to come in and quietly pick the guy up in June 2003 when ... and if this seems a tad "convenient", you're not alone in thinking so, but newspapers reported that a couple spotted Luster, called the FBI... and the DOG. The Dog showed up -- with a TV crew in tow -- in time to get into a barroom brawl with the fugitive heir. Mexican cops threw the whole lot of them into jail. Where someone paid "bajo fianza" to spring the Dog from the pound. Luster somehow also was out of jail -- presumably as a courtesy to the FBI, allowing the G-men to put Luster on a plane and fly him back to the U.S. without going through an extradition hearing. That would not make for great drama. Or tacky television. DOG kidnapped Luster, put him on a private plane and ... the rest, they say, is history. Lest we forget, DOG is a bailbondsman. Somehow he managed to get bajo finanza for this very serious charge... and promptly fled the country. Sort of like... oh... Andrew Luster? Dog milked that "capture" for everything it was worth. He's a master showman who manages to appeal both to his white trash roots and to the sophisticated. In Mexican terms, he's a naco -- rich white trash, with excreable taste in jewelry and a ridiculous haircut that was a joke even when it was semi-fashionable 15 years ago. But, then, American culture since WWII has been defined by a lot of poor boys who never passed through the middle class. Though those boys had talent -- Warhol, Liberace, Elvis. Dog had...? Good publicitiy, basically. Somehow the biker and his big-boobed foul-mouthed wife became de rigor television viewing in the U.S. While no one with any taste or culture would want to BE THOSE people -- there's a weird fascination with the Chapman family (maybe due to the fact than we're lucky none of us know anyone remotely like them). For people who DO know people like them, there's the satisfaction of seeing themselves as the "good" people against the bad guys. The bad guys, more often than not, are darker skinned than Duane's fan club. I don't think that's quite coincidental, as the amazing posts from The JAWA Report article on his arrest indicate. I'll leave their names off to protect the moronic:
Fuck Mexico!! How dare those assholes take our number one well known american hero and imprision him aftrer all the crimes they committ here.. Screw Mexico..Let's go to war and blow em like we did in Iraq!!
I guess two wrongs make a right, or something like that. As to getting blown in Iraq, ok... but what does that have to do with Mexico.
he is not a criminal and he did not break any laws, because mexico has no laws, just revenge for taking out a rich man, who was pooling tons of money into mexico. i agree with military action, take the illegal mexicans out of our country or the people will one way or another.
Uh... kidnapping gets you 30 to 50 years in Mexico. Murderers only get 20. Duane was a very, very bad boy. And, the one I love...
What is wrong with this sick world is it not bad enough we have so many mexicans taking our jobs and and their spanish on every recording and instruction mannuel we have ever gotten! Dog and Beth are good family people Bush step your sorry but in on this one.They have gotten so many bad people off the streets and helped many that would be nowhere without Dog And Beth's and the whole Chapman family, I will be praying for them all, we can't let them get away with this!!!!!!!!
"Instruction mannuel"... wasn't he the translator I used to work with when I was a technical writer?

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Protecting America

We're rough mountainous terrain down here in the Chihuahua Desert. Some people say it looks like Afghanistan. West of the Pecos, we have mountains, drugs are a big part of our rural economy, and there's some well-armed crazies back in the hills, too. But all similarities end there. Rick Perry (and even Kinky Friedman, who is a smart guy and should know better) might be saying something different, but the National Guard is NOT here to look for some enemy. There is no enemy. There is only us. The 1200 or so Texas Guardsmen, and the units from Illinois and elsewhere are nice enough guys... young kids to me. Their job is to answer the telephones and do the filing (and man some observation stations) for the Border Patrol.. They are not looking for "terrorists", we are not at war with Mexico, nor with its citizens, (even the drug dealers just get turned over to Judge Edwards and his one-room Federal Courthouse in Alpine). And they are not at war with American citizens. Take young guys, a hot night along the Rio Grande/Bravo del Norte, nothing much to do but ride around and drink beer... add in never getting any time off after returning from a war zone, and give them weapons... What do you think is going to happen?
Three Texas National guardsmen were in custody Tuesday, accused of firing guns in an Eagle Pass neighborhood, officials told News 4 WOAI. The three men were down on the U.S./Mexico border to help in the fight against illegal immigration, officials said. The guardsmen face felony charges of deadly conduct for a shooting spree last week, investigators said. The guardsmen were drinking and driving, and taking turns shooting a gun out of the window, authorities said.
People here remember the last time we had military "assistance" with border security.

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Twist and shout!

Mexicans love their Independence Day -- so much so that they make it a two day holiday. Padre Hidalgo rang the church bell either late the 15th or early the 16th of September 1810. He called the people to church to hear a rather ill-thought out impromptu sermon on... among other things, Napoleon Bonaparte, the evils of atheism and the perfidity of the Spanish. What, exactly he blathered on about wasn't all that important. The Padre had a boffo finish: "Kill the Spanish! Viva Mexico!" At which point the locals did kill the Spanish. And then were killed by them... and ... killed the Spanish... who killed the Mexicans... who killed each other... who, ten years later, ended up with a pro-Spanish Mexicans rebelling against pro-Mexican Spaniards to join with pro-Mexican Mexicans. Quite the sermon! Silly Maximiliano de Absurdo... er, de HAPSBURGO... who had some strange ideas of how to get people to take him seriously (he took himself seriously),rounded up the royal court, hauled them out to Delores Hidalgo, recreated an edifying version of the Padre's patriotic "grito" and then bored everyone with an interminably dull lecture on the need for Mexican patriotism and good relations with Spain. Ok, Max, can we go to bed now? OK, good idea, bad execution. Porfirio Diaz, realizing that "Hey, it's Mexico's birthday... well, it's my birthday too!" had a better formula. Like Max, he wasn't out to kill the Spanish, and -- for all his faults -- was a real Mexican. If you're going to keep people up all night -- HAVE A PARTY! If you have to give a speech (and Porfirio did), get it out of the way. Porfirio learned from the Padre - the speech itself is unimportant. Just have a good closing. And no need to invent one: that VIVA MEXICO works is a sure crowd pleaser. SO... every 15 September since then, at 11 p.m., the President (and State Governor, and Municipal President and Alcalde) goes out on the local government palace balcony, rings a bell in honor of the Padre's churchbell, gives a (generally upbeat, "ain't I great") speech and starts the grito... Viva this, Viva Mexico! Viva that, VIVA MEXICO, viva the other thing, ¡VIVA MEXICO! The best gritoistas can really string it out. You start Viva-ing along for mom, tacos and Manzana "Lift", and before you know it, you're shouting for the long life of... Pemex, the "Corridor al Pacifico" rail-toll road project and the Algamatated Sheet Metal Workers Union Local #345 (or the Mexican equivalent thereof). And, of course, vivaing Mexico. ... or, as Vicente Fox (a master gritoista) puts it... VEEEEE- VAAAAAAAAA MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE- COUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU! AND then, PARTY TIME. Slaughtering Spaniards being passe, the worst any foreigner can expect is to be silly-stringed by passing patriots. Consuming mass quantities of patriotic national products -- Coronoa, Dos Eqqis, Modelo... If you can't fight em, join em... which is why you need the whole next day off as well. What could be better than a national party? TWO NATIONAL PARTIES, of course. The "virtual president", Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, never one to let a chance for a theatrical performance slip through his fingers, will be giving a counter-grito on the Zocalo the same time as President Fox. This will be ... interesting. May the grittiest gritoist win. ¡VIVA MEXICO! (twice).

Sunday, September 10, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Vincente Fox does Sinatra...

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

The Boob on the Tube...

The only documented terrorism arrest at the Texas border involved a U.S. citizen crossing at El Paso in 2004. Wyoming college student Mark Robert Walker was accused of trying to go to Somalia to help overthrow the Somali government. Walker pleaded guilty last year and was sentenced to two years in federal prison. (AP, September 09, 2006) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh4NIz6GEUo Oh well, it is an election year in Texas, the weirdest state in the Union. (REPUBLISHED POST)
All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses"... now serving #12

Check out the visa bulletin on the Web site of the U.S. State Department, and you will see the problem immigrants face. The government offers 140,000 employment-based visas a year, with 5,000 set aside for unskilled workers, and most have been allotted years in advance. The State Department has a quaint term for the unavailability of visas — they are "oversubscribed." Two Mexicans received visas as unskilled laborers last year, according to the New York Times. And so it goes. Anti-immigrant forces tell the workers to step "to the back of the line." But if you are Mexican or Guatemalan or Colombian, the line for legal residency is not merely long; it is nonexistent. "There is no line to step to the back of," Marshall Fitz, an official with the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said. "The biggest misconception is that the reason people come here illegally is because they would rather do that than do it legally. The vast majority does so because they have no legal channel to come here. That is the reality." (San Antonio Express-News)

Saturday, September 09, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Poetry and protest...

What happens to a dream deferred?
Does it dry up like a raisin in the sun?
Or fester like a sore-- And then run?
Does it stink like rotten meat?
Or crust and sugar over-- like a syrupy sweet?
Maybe it just sags like a heavy load.
Or does it explode?

photo: Reforma.com

The protests -- and the photo (these protests were in Cuernavaca, and forced President-elect Calderón to cancel a visit to his hometown) made me think about what the people are really protesting -- not the particular candidate, but the whole system that they see as rigged. Mexico has done fairly well in the last century, and the poor should not be poor... but are. What AMLO and the election meant to these people was a chance to change a rigged system... to get their shot at a decent life... if not a Lexus, at least a used Vocho.

There's the theory that what causes people to rebel is not inequality, but the perception of inequality... the frustration of seeing a wealth and a decent standard of living denied... there are academics who've written on this, and you can look up "think tank" position papers on it... or you can read poetry.

Wouldn't you know it. There is a Mexican connection.

Langston Hughes was born in Lawrence Kansas in 1902. His family was middle-class, educated and distinguished. A grandfather had fought with John Brown. On the other side, his grandparents were pioneer settlers in Okahoma. His father had a law degree. But, the family had a problem -- or America had a problem. The Hughes were African-American. James N. Hughes could not reconcile himself to his own "dream deferred." Unable to practice law, he left his family behind to take up a new life running a factory in Toluca.

In Mexico, Hughes Sr. was just another gringo. He was prosperous, and -- by the standards of Toluca -- wealthy. When 16-year old Langston graduated from High School, his father sent for him. Langston always claimed he wrote his first poem ("A Negro Speaks of the River") on Kansas City to Mexico City train. Though he would travel widely the rest of his life, Mexico ... and later Harlem, would remain his true home.

James was a proud, difficult man. To his Mexican workers, we was a codo pinche gringo, but they accepted his son. Langston, like so many gay adolescents, wasn't comfortable with his father, nor his father with him. Like so many footloose gringos since, he found a job teaching English. And, he learned to write. Langston spent more time with the workers, one of the people, than with his gringo father -- like most writers, more an observer than a participant, but he managed to acquire fluent Spanish that stood him well in his future life.

James had turned his back on Jim Crow America, and even if he did not quite understand his son, he did not want Langston to go back to a race obsessed country. James was a wealthy man -- he offered to pay Langston's education, provided he study something practical, and out of the United States. But, Langston was already a poet. And his mother wanted him back. James finally agreed to pay for Langston to attend Colombia University, since he and his mother could live in Harlem -- a respectable "Negro" neighborhood in the segregated U.S. of his day.-- if he studied Engineering.

Langston never finished his degree. He soon tired of a "respectable" academic job, as a secretary to Carter Woodson, the father of African-American history, but found he made more money (and for a young gay man, had a better time) working as a waiter and busboy... and then as a cabin boy on merchant ships.

Good-looking, bilingual, witty and intellegent, Langston got by until 1925, when he was "discovered" by Vachel Lindsay. Lindsay was white, but his poetry mixed jazz riffs and evangelical religious themes (he was the rap star of the Great Gatsby era) which made him the expert on who was -- and who wasn't -- an authentic Negro voice. Langston was in.

Like other artists, he had to put up with patrons. Someone launched the bright idea of sending him on a speaking tour around the rural South -- which during the Jim Crow 1920s, was not exactly the safest place for an African-American intellectual. With some rueful humor, he noted the absurdity of segregation. In places that wouldn't serve "negros", they would serve him if he was a Mexican. In Texas, where there was segregated facilities for Mexicans... he was tempted to claim to be Cuban -- just to see what would happen.

Though he could laugh at segreation and racism, like his father, he never reconciled himself to it. Unlike his father, he never saw wealth or respectabilty as a way of immunizing himself from it. He continually returned to Mexico, sharing an apartment (now gone, near Plaza Garibaldi) in the 1930s with Henri Cartier Bresson, who documented the lives of la Capital's poor. Hughes wrote respecfully of the city's poor, and of Mexican rural life for a number of publications. Like other minority writers of the time, he joined the Communist Party, but other than writing for "The Masses," he was too much an artist to have much to do with the Party. In the 1950s, he returnrf to Mexico to avoid political persecution for his former Communist association.

By the mid-1960s, Hughes' writings were more or less relegated to junior high school anthologies. Already dying of cancer, he gave up writing his weekly newspaper column in 1965, and died in 1967. Despite admirers like James Baldwin (himself African-American and gay), Hughes was seen as passe, a figure from the "Harlem Renaissance" and insuficiently militant for the time. He wasn't "black enough". Nor should he have been. As his Mexican writing shows, it wasn't "race" or place that he noticed -- it was the people, their folk ways and spirt of survival, their dreams and their dreams deferred.

Photos, Henri Cartier Bresson,

Mexico City, 1934

Friday, September 08, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Many Mexicos... beyond Calderón v AMLO...

"This idea that there is a country split between two ideological positions is a deceptive fabrication of the political actors and the candidates.
Alberto Saracho, director of the non-governmental Idea Foundation
The way Mexicans voted in July and several opinion polls show that political preferences are not clearly split along socioeconomic, political, ethnic, age, regional or party lines.
...
According to the official vote tally, Calderón took the votes of just 20.8 percent of the 71.3 million voters registered in this country of 106 million, while abstention amounted to 41.5 percent.
Meanwhile, López Obrador of the "For the Good of All" coalition made up of his Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) and the small Convergencia and Trabajo parties, won the votes of 20 percent of registered voters. The leftist candidate earned more than 50 percent of the vote in three of the country's 32 states, while Calderón did so in just two states.
And each of the two candidates was defeated by Roberto Madrazo of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) -- which ruled Mexico from 1929 to 2000 -- in several states.
...
"It is intellectually dishonest to maintain, as political leaders are doing in city squares or in private, that the country is politically divided between right and left or rich and poor, when reality shows otherwise," political scientist Rossana Fuentes, at the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico, told IPS.
The simplification of the confrontation to two positions or candidates "disregards the pluralism that defines any society, and distances civil society from the political system," said Fuentes.
In a nationwide survey of 2,100 people carried out by the daily Reforma just before the elections, 29 percent of low-income respondents said they would vote for López Obrador and 22 percent for Calderón. The breakdown, meanwhile, was 30 percent for each candidate among the lower-middle income respondents; 29 percent for each candidate among the upper-middle income respondents; and 25 percent for López Obrador and 47 percent for Calderón among the upper income respondents.
...
With regard to ideological orientation, 54 percent of those who defined themselves as left-of-centre said they would vote for López Obrador and 14 percent for Calderón, while 36 percent of those who identified with the right said they would vote for Calderón and 21 percent for López Obrador. The two candidates had the support of equal portions -- 29 percent -- of respondents who see themselves as in the centre of the spectrum.
(Full article, MEXICO: The Myth of a Country Divided Between Left and Right by Diego Cevallos, September 8 2006, InterPress News Service.

Thursday, September 07, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Fresh vegetables... pick your own...

Why immigrants come to the United States and work crappy jobs is no secret. Carolyn Lochhead, of the San Francisco Chronicle wrote an excellent article on this back in May. People go where they're paid a decent wage. But what about the crap jobs that can't pay very well. You listen to the blowhards at CNN or Fox, and they'll tell you that of course there are American workers to do these jobs. Calling Lou Dobbs, paging Ann Coulter -- you're needed right now out in the California farm fields.

Labor shortage worsens as peak harvest nears By Kate Campbell, Assistant Editor California Farm Bureau Federation Ag Alert Against a backdrop of Congressional inaction, California farmers wait for comprehensive immigration reform and prepare for harvest. ... right now growers say labor uncertainties are their biggest worry. Members of the U.S. House of Representatives, meanwhile, are holding a series of public hearings across the nation that largely exclude agriculture. "Right now we're heading into peak harvest season in California when there's the greatest demand for farmworkers," said California Farm Bureau President Doug Mosebar. "Because we know there already are critical shortages, we are joining other agricultural groups to better track the labor supply situation. We'll be surveying our members in coming days to get the best and most up-to-date information on labor shortages as possible." ... Already some fields in the Pajaro Valley in Santa Cruz County are being abandoned because farmers can't find enough workers. Farmers in that area say there are 10 percent to 20 percent fewer workers available to harvest strawberry, raspberry and vegetable crops. Carolyn O'Donnell of the California Strawberry Commission says her organization is hearing that labor is very tight. In the Watsonville area some farms have enough and some don't. Others blame a broken H2A temporary worker program for the shortage. Many point to tightened border security and competition from other business sectors for entry-level workers. ... "Due to shortages, guys go where they get paid the most so they keep moving. Labor contractors are short of people. Harvest scares me to death," the grower said. In Santa Clara County, a field crop farmer said, "Because of the lack of help, we cannot get our crops irrigated in a timely manner. We will lose about 30 percent of our alfalfa this year." A tree fruit farmer in the Fresno area said because of lighter than usual crops, he thinks his operation will get by with 10 percent fewer workers this season. But he expects that when the grape harvest gets going in late August, the labor shortage will become extreme. "If we have a normal crop next year, we could experience even more crop losses because of a big shortage of labor," he said. Information released by the Agriculture Department's National Agricultural Statistics Service for the first quarter of 2006 pegs the number of hired workers on U.S. farms at 718,000, down nearly 4 percent from the previous year. As the crop year progresses, these statistics from USDA suggest the labor squeeze will be greatly magnified not only in the United States, but in California, the nation's No. 1 farm state. The government report, which offers the most current statistical look at the national farm labor situation, shows that wages increased sharply during the same period, while the number of workers dropped. The national average wage paid to farmworkers is up nearly 5 percent from one year ago and up 18 percent from 2001. Wage increases for hired farmworkers were reported in every region of the country where government data is collected. Earl Hall, owner of Hall Management Corp. in Kerman, said, "Everyone is struggling for workers. It has been a struggle even for us--we're looking for machine operators, tractor drivers and sorters. I personally got three different calls last week from people I'm not supplying farm labor to that want help because they cannot find enough workers. "These are big companies that normally use only in-house workers and don't use farm labor contractors," Hall said. "They can't find enough people for picking tree fruit, working in canneries--they're short everyone. And for the first time I'm getting calls from growers of green and fresh market tomatoes that are short workers. Irrigators are really in short supply. "On the Central Coast, they're struggling to find people to harvest strawberries," said Hall, who operates in 26 California counties and employs between 1,500 and 2,500 agricultural workers a day, depending on the season. "And the heat a few weeks ago seriously compounded problems. Every employer I know made adjustments--working crews shorter hours while the crops were ripening faster." But, Hall said even with cooler temperatures in the fields, the workers just aren't out there. And, California isn't the only place where farm labor is in short supply. According to recent media reports, one farmer in Cowlitz County in Washington state reported one-third of his blueberry crop rotted in the field for want of enough pickers. Apple growers in Central Washington were scrambling to find someone--anyone--to do the important work of thinning the apple crop to ensure the best and largest fruit for harvest. The Associated Press reported that some Oregon farmers contend the U.S. government's decision to place National Guard troops along the Mexican border is contributing to a shortage of workers to pick their ripe fruit. Terry Drazdoff said farmworkers should have been harvesting 25 tons of fruit per day from his Polk County cherry orchard. Instead, he could hire only enough temporary farmworkers to pick 6 tons. In the Bradenton Herald, Mike Carlton, director of production and labor affairs at Florida Citrus Mutual, noted, "There's very little doubt we'll leave a significant amount of fruit on the trees." Orange production in Florida has been predicted to be the lowest since 1992, in part due to last year's hurricane damage. But even with a smaller crop, it appears the primary problem growers face now is a shortage of fruit pickers, Carlton said. The American Farm Bureau Federation has compiled data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Department of Labor and from its own studies and analyzed that information in light of legislative efforts to amend existing immigration law. The conclusions are stark. AFBF has found, among other things, that if Congress enacts legislation that deals only with border security and enforcement, the impact on fruit and vegetable farmers nationwide would be between $5 billion and $9 billion annually. Net farm income in the rest of the agricultural sectors would decline between $1.5 billion and $5 billion a year. "If federal legislation is enacted that fails to take into account the unique needs of agriculture, which include our increasing dependence on hired labor, our extreme vulnerability to competitively priced foreign-grown produce and our inability either to absorb cost increases or pass those on, we will all watch as Congress takes literally billions of dollars out of the pockets of American farmers and sends it to our competitors overseas," said Stefphanie Gambrell, domestic policy economist at AFBF.

If the best the Republicans can push is a wall... don't be surprised if there's a consumer response...

(photo courtesty U.C. Riverside)

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Is it surreal enough yet?

Ok, so Calderón won by... what, 230,000 out of 41 million votes? That's strange, that's incredible. And, if you think he might not have been legitimately elected, you're not alone. Now... for a real kicker... what if Vincente Fox is really a.... GRINGO? Chente and Martita are going to be heading back to their little ranchito in Guanjuanto soon... though some of their neighbors might not be so glad to see them. It seems one of the neighbors, researching a lawsuit, stumbled across some documents from 1940, where José Luis Fox Pont, Chente's dear old dad, swore he was a United States citizen. Everybody knows Fox's mom was a Basque, and you have to have at least ONE Mexican parent if you're going to be President, so this could be a real problem. But, wait... it's Mexico. It gets weirder. The story about the Don José Luis' deposition appeared August 30. September 1, dead old dad's birth certificate just happened to surface, showing he was born in Iraputo, but his parents "maintain their North American citizenship"... meaning? According to the powers that be... Vincente Fox is the son of a Mexican ... though, some of his neighbors think he's a hijo de... something else. Just as well. Would TEJPF have to oversee re-running the 2000 election?... or would Mexico resolve the problem the way they resolved it last time a foreigner claimed (erroneously) to run Mexiico? You know, that nice Max Habsburg... the guy that inspired Eduard Manet... The Agnonist has great fun with this.

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

The pen is mightier than the grenade...

You read about drug POLICY in publications like New York Times or Jornada . If you want to read about the "war on drugs," you won't find it on the front lines either. The McAllen Monitor or the Laredo Morning Times might give you some combat reports, and the body count, but there's only so much they can do... or will. Anyone who writes on the border -- on either side -- is going to think twice about covering the narco wars. Too much money -- coming from the U.S. appitite for this shit -- is involved. And the Mexican narcos, having no way to settle their territorial disputes, aren't prone to legal nicities. If you think writing on some crooked land deal or corporate chincanery is risky, you really don't want to deal with these businessmen. Some of my colleagues in places like Del Rio and McAllen -- and Nuevo Laredo and Ciudad Acuña mkae the common-sense decision that no story is worth getting tortured and killed over. They're crime reporters ... not war correspondents. Down in the Yucatan, far from the border, Por Esto! is one of the more popular newspapers in Mexico. It's not a "great" paper in the sense that its reporters are talking heads on the news shows, or that the editorials are discussed in Congress. It's a good, old fashioned sports, scandal and crime paper. The kind of thing taxi drivers and hair dressers have around to pass the time. But, the Yucatan is a hotbed of corrpution and dubious money. There's a lot of cash floating around -- thanks to the tourist trade -- which makes it a perfect place for the narcos to set up business. Reporters for papers like Por Esto! are poorly paid, or free-lancers. They're enterprising. They're fearless. Or, maybe, they're crazy. But they've given Por Esto! de Merida an international reputation. To my knowledge, it's the only regional Mexican daily ever sued for libel in a New York State courts. The banker suing the paper (they'd claimed he was involved in money laundering), I'm happy to say, lost. Lately, the paper -- or rather a moonlighting anthopology professor -- has been writing about environmental damage related to the tourist hotels, and the problems dealing with toxins around Cancun. So, when a couple of guys jumped out of a truck last week, lobbed a couple of grenades in the paper's front office and hightailed it to the bus station... the state police arrested -- the professor! If something doesn't seem right about that... you're not alone. Those taxi drivers and housewives and shoe-shine men didn't buy it either. While the professor is out of jail, the paper is surrounded -- by the people -- and the taxi drivers have set up round the clock surveillence to protect THEIR paper. I hadn't heard about this (like most commentators, I've been preoccupied with the Presidential election), but Por Esto!'s sometime partner-in-crime, Narco News (which was co-defendant in the New York lawsuit) -- with their usual spin and flair for yellow journalism -- has been on top of this. That's a shame. Taxi drivers, housewives... and now the local Bishop... standing up for the free press. Casualties of the drug war fight back ... demand free press... power to the people: and, we'll be lucky to see a small AP article by the same reporter who has to put out "Spring-breakers run beserk in Cancun." Someone suggests bombing the New York Times, and the most you get are some worried editorials and sad comments from the talking heads. And people wonder why I say Mexico is under-reported.

Sunday, September 03, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

V. Fox -- seen the "right" way

I know I'll get some criticism for this, but not everyone at the freerepublic.com is a raving lunatic reactionary. I make fun of freerepublic.com all the time -- which is sometimes like shooting fish in a barrel. It attracts more than it's share of religious cranks, homophobes, racists and know-nothings. But, then, so do most ideological message boards -- and all message boards, for that matter. But cranks have their uses -- anybody with a real hangup on one or another issue is going to take the time to mine everything -- and anything -- for information. I skim through freerepublic.com about one a week (sometimes once a day) looking for articles on immigration and/or Mexico... usually some "illegal alien" somewhere had a car accident and no insurance, but sometimes something more useful, or interesting. Hey, I'm a crank that way too. I've read more than my share of "fight the capitalist hegonemy, go AMLO!" posts from cranks in small (and not so small) ideological left-wing blogs -- written generally by folks who may know their Trostksy, but never have been anywhere near Mexico, or know anything about the Mexican political or economic system. I admit I was suprised to find in a forum I usually only visit for vicarious thrills -- or to find out what "the other side" is up to -- to run across the reasonable, logical "St. Jacques". Of course, we'll never agree on politics -- nor, I suspect -- on anything else. We had a fruitful "private message" exchange about the Zapatistas, when he mistakenly included them in the "Por el bien de todos" coalition of AMLO. "St. Jacques" experience has been in Columbia, where there has been an oddball "leftist" rebel group that sometimes sounds like the Zapatistas, but the issues are very different -- and, I don't see the Zapatistas as the "left", but as indigenous anti-modernists (i.e., reactionaries). "St. Jacques" sees AMLO as anti-democratic, I don't. I agree that Fox's 2000 election was a democratic success -- but think the transition has been a step backwards. And, I agree that Fox's economic program was semi-successful. I might disagree on the particulars (I think bringing in foriegn oil companies would be a disaster, for example), but he makes some good points, and gives Fox the credit for things I sometimes forget. Hey, I'm liberal enough to give a conservative a voice in here! With some slight editing (I ran together three message threads, moving the second above the first, and incorporating some explications he made in his third), "St. Jacques" produces a well-written, conservative's assessment of the Fox administation that's a rarity in the U.S., from the left or the right -- managing to accept Mexico on Mexican terms.
The administration of Vicente Fox has been far more honest in its intent and in its accomplishments than any of the PRI regimes which preceded it, and were all genuinely corrupt to their core. Vicente Fox was the first truly democratically-elected President of Mexico since the PRI organized Mexican politics into a one-party system in the 1930's. Fox has made some progress, especially in the handling of national government finances and the exercise of federal power over state and local governments. Not a lot of people know about the economic and fiscal successes of Fox's administration. Mexico had 0.2% negative growth in its GDP his first year in office, the most recent statistics say this year's growth to date is 5.5%. They had an inflation rate of 6.3% that has now been reduced to something just above 3%. Their national debt, not the annual deficit, has been reduced 20%, from about $50 billion (U.S.) to $40 billion. Poverty rates have declined, particularly in the rural countryside. Interest rates have dropped significantly. The purchasing power of the peso has grown in step with all of the aforementioned. When you compare these accomplishments with the absolute and near criminal mismanagement of Mexico under the PRI for the previous twenty years or so, the record is a very good one. And as for foreign investment, it has been flowing into Mexico for the last few years. Citigroup just bought out a Mexican bank, several other large foreign consortiums have opened up shop in Mexico, and the Mexican stock market, the Bolsa, which was put on a very tight leash by the Fox administration, has begun attracting capital at a very high rate over the past three years or so. Money sent to Mexico by immigrants to the U.S., whether the small number of legals or the great number of illegals, is the second largest source of foreign exchange for the country after oil revenues. But that flow of money has been constant, though growing slightly, over the past twenty-plus years which begs the question "why didn't the PRI governments do better when it constituted a greater percentage of their GDP than it does today?" And the money is a smaller percentage of Mexico's GDP today given the higher price for oil, which is actually more important in explaining Fox's success. The real story here is that for the first time in memory and increase in the price of oil was actually returned to the Mexican government, rather than being stolen by those in the PRI. However, Fox has been unable to tame Mexico's "crony capitalism," which is still a holdover from the years of PRI dominance. Mexico's banking and financial system is still top-heavy, with wealth concentrated in a small number of institutions. Access to capital is still very much dependent upon "who you know" rather than an independent assessment of your credit-worthiness. And then there are the state-run monopolies in the Oil and Electricity industries that are still a source of significant corruption among the state bureaucrats who run them. Kickbacks for job placement and promotions, bribes funneled into the right hands result in the awarding of contracts, and the outright purchasing of union agreements by their leaders, at times under terms contrary to the interests of their own rank and file, are all still a part of the way "business is done" in Mexico today. It is no longer possible to raid the treasury directly or to deposit public funds in private accounts, even if just to keep the interest, as was done under the PRI, which was due to Fox' – but it is not enough. Fox tried to address so many of these issues with the Mexican Congress (and I do give him credit for trying), but it was dominated by the PRI, bent upon sabotaging his reform program, and permitting them to approach the Mexican people in the elections this year as "the party who can get things done." It backfired on the PRI, because they were the really big losers this past July 2 and now find themselves demoted from the number one power in the Mexican national legislature, to the number three. I must confess that I am disappointed in the fact that Fox, the PAN and PRI Deputies and Senators, and others who could have made a difference did not stand up to the intimidation of the PRD last night when they occupied the rostrum in the Mexican Congress and prevented Fox from delivering his official Informe, or the "Government Report," which is similar to our "State of the Union Address" in this country. But as I read Fox's address, I detected a tone of conciliation and a larger call to Mexicans to step up and keep the social and political peace before the protests over the election and other conflicts take the country off the deep end. So in light of that observation I think I at least understand Fox's thinking in that a conciliatory message would not be well-received if its very delivery was predicated upon a physical confrontation on Mexican national television. I must say to everyone that the way all of this went down yesterday has caused me to sit down and reflect upon what may have been some miscalculation on my own part as to what is really driving events from the viewpoint of Fox and the federal government. And what I mean by this is that I may have underestimated the threat Fox and his administration perceive in conflicts outside of the presidential election controversy, creating a nightmare scenario that they may all come together as one. I refer specifically to the near-chaos that now exists in the southern Mexican states of Oaxaca and Chiapas, where two separate controversies raise the possibility of what is repeatedly referred to in the Mexican press as La Ingobernabilidad del Pais (The Ingovernability of the Country). In Oaxaca a teachers strike that began last May has morphed into a popular demand, which is approaching a popular uprising, for the ouster of the PRI Governor Ulises Ruiz, whose corruption and mismanagement of the state coupled with a strong police crackdown on demonstrators, has brought public life there to a complete halt. In neighboring Chiapas the recent gubernatorial election a few weeks back appears to be an obvious instance of election fraud -- real election fraud -- in that the PRD seem to have stolen the seat and their state electoral institute has validated it. I expect to see this election "annulled" (a possibility under Mexican electoral law) in the not too distant future and, whether this happens or not, someone is going to be very angry. There have already been some instances of para-military actions against the landless poor in Chiapas and the whole situation there is a veritable powder keg waiting to explode in my opinion. So right now I'm mulling all of this over in my head, because my mind is not entirely made up as to whether I should view the post-election presidential controversy in and of itself, or whether I should place it within the larger context of a possible and coming "ingovernability" of Mexico. I really need to think this one over.
"St. Jacques", in Free Republic

Saturday, September 02, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

Informe... y contre-informe....

Informe coverage from Televisa. "No iremos al Informe para no caer en provocaciones; AMLO" provided by XHPEJE In the first, you see President Fox NOT give a speech, but pass off the document out in the hallway. Note that the "radicals" all join in singing the Himno Nacional...
All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

C'mon where's the noise? Quiet Riot in the Camera...

The third of so of this blog's visitors who come from The Lonely Planet's "Thorn Tree Mexico Message Board" know there's one poster I think is anti-Mexican, made his small claim to fame writing on how much he hates Oaxaca (so, naturally, writes on and on and on about Oaxaca's political situation... incoherently blaming leftists and tourists for both causing trouble, and for claiming foreigners aren't facing any particular danger) and who shows way too much interest in pedophilia and the pedophile-popular resort hotels of Acapulco, for his reactionary postings to be taken seriously. I think the guy is nuts, but he also posts sometimes useful information on bus schedules or hotel locations that give him some credibility. However, like most reactionaries, and most anti-Mexican "Mexico experts", he goes ballistic when the Mexicans don't behave the way he thinks they should. So... having claimed that "radicals" took over the Chamber and prevented the Informe, I thought I'd put up this video of a rather tame protest for a chamber that had to pass a rule two years ago forbidding livestock on the floor, after a farmer's group rode in on horseback.
Google.com.es: Legislators take the podium in Congress to prevent Vincent Fox from delivering his VI "Informe de Goberno.
If for some reason you can't see the above Google.com video, try here: Looks kinda tame to me. And, what's radical about flying the country's flag?

Friday, September 01, 2006

All posts were moved (11/2006) to http://mexfiles.wordpress.com

"I don't like your attitude" Fox

A not bad review of what WAS SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN (written well in advance of the speech's scheduled . 7 p.m. Mexico City Time start ) was written by Ceci Connelly of the Washington Post. The published (pre-delivery) version of Fox's speech was already on the presidential website... and then this. Leftists disrupt opening of Mexican parliament Friday September 1, 2006 Mexico City- Lawmakers loyal to a leftist who claims he won Mexico's presidential election disrupted the national parliament's opening session Friday, forcing its suspension. Members of Andres Lopez Obrador's Party of Democratic Revolution (PRD) occupied the speaker's podium, waved Mexican flags and shouted "Obrador, Obrador" as they prevented outgoing President Vicente Fox from giving his farewell speech to a joint session of both houses. Lopez Obrador claims he was robbed of victory in July 2 presidential elections after official counts showed him losing to conservative Felipe Calderon by less than one percentage point. During Friday's tumult, PRD lawmakers accused Fox of treason and took up Lopez Obrador's calls for a recount of the nationwide presidential voting. © 2006 DPA - Deutsche Presse-Agenteur (Photo: The Raw Story) What happened? From E-Once Noticias (my translation) For the first time in the country's history, the Chief Executive was prevented from reading his ceremonial State of the Nation (“Informe de Gobierno”) speech. “Given the attitude of that group of legislators which make it impossible to read my prepared message, I'm leaving the chamber,” Vincente Fox Quesada said. As PRD members shouted and waved placards in the Chamber, the text was handed to the Senate Presiding Committee (Mesa Directive del Senado). The commotion began when Revolutionary Democratic (PRD) Senator Carlos Navarrete sat down on the podium, and refused to leave. He was joined moments later by other PRD legislators. This violation of the Constitution cannot be accepted by this Congress, in any manner. I request – excuse me, Mr. Senator – I call on the legislator – excuse me, I request to be allowed to finish my speech. OK. Since you won't let the Party of the Democratic Revolution give their response, the conditions do not exist for a Congressional Session. My companions and I are not leaving this room until constitutional guarantees are re-establshed, and so... this session is suspended de facto,” Navarrete proclaimed. Minutes later, PAN Senator Jorque Zermeño, the Senate Coordinating Committee Chair, which was in charge of the joint session, declared a recess to allow people to cool down. However, Zermeño decided not to reconvene the session. Instead, he returned to claim “This Presidency has submitted its report, and President Vincete Fox Quesada has complied with the regulations established in Article 69 of the Constitution of the United Mexican States. He was present at the opening of the session, and entered in writing the Informe." El Universal is reporting Fox was going to read the speech on TV from Los Pinos. Ironically, it's the Cuban News Agency (Prensa Latina) that explains the parliamentary manouvering by which Fox tecnically fulfilled his constitutional duty. This is a public relations disaster for Fox. Like the U.S. President's "State of the Union Address" the audience for the Informe includes the diplomatic corps and foreign press. This year, the head of Mexico City, Alehjandro Encinas, publically refused to attend. As did several "usual suspects" on the left. Even more than the State of the Union, this is an extremely important event for Mexican presidents. Until recently, when the Legislature began to assume an advesarial role in Mexican politics, it was more a "Speech from the Throne" -- with all the pomp and circumstance that would go with a speech by Queen Elizabeth or King Juan-Carlos -- than a mere political address. Gustavo Diaz-Ordaz, whose Presidency over-lapped LBJ's and Dick Nixon's (and was more devious than both of them put together) made his name in Mexican politics when, as a back-bencher for the PRI, he would sit next to the one or two opposition party legislators then around, and jab a pistol into the their ribs when it was time for unanamous applause. Which the President used to get. Salinas, Zedillo, Fox have all had raucuos Informes, but this is a first. ever since they've started televising the Informe, it's been great theater (when Carlos Salinas was pres, they couldn't show you the legislators wearing piggy masks and oinking at him... before they let the speech be televised, they had to pass a law that you couldn't wear masks in the Camera de dipudatos!). One of the best was a couple of years ago when a very good looking PT (ex-communist) Delegate from Chiapas planted a funeral wreath to protest his contentions that things were going well in her state. The PANistas started shouting "tubo! tubo!" -- "take it off, take it off" -- but that's what you shout at a stripper, not a delegate. Of course, as I said, she was a extremely good looking woman, and immaculately dressed. Maybe the PANistas needed the piggy costumes.

I'm still assuming that Calderón will be declared the winner in the July election next week, but whether he'll be able to govern is an open question at this point.